On April 27, a plane that usually serves as Air Force One was flying low over the New York City skyline and generating worldwide interest.
Actually, I did the image in Photoshop. The building and view over NYC is a real photo. I added the three flying objects. The third flying object (if you look carefully) is a flying saucer. Of course, Uncle Sam could have saved $328,835 by asking a graphic designer with Photoshop to provide an image of Air Force One over New York. However, using Government purchasing philosophy, why spend fifty bucks when you can spend several hundred thousand dollars for the same thing. -TP-


















I've almost believed in it! And I haven't recognized an UFO at first
Posted by: freelance writer philippines | April 12, 2011 at 06:04 AM
Be positive that you simply have never ever had any regrets within your lifestyle which only lasts for any couple of decades. Chuckle or cry as you like, and it is meaningless to oppress oneself.
Posted by: new Jordans | October 07, 2010 at 09:33 PM
Why let people grow their own cancer cures for next to nothing when they can spent BILLIONS every year on "Police Enforcement", lawyers' fees, the court system and the prison-industrial complex!
Posted by: Round and Brown | June 30, 2010 at 05:04 AM
Ur blog is very nice!
Posted by: website design New York City | January 25, 2010 at 08:55 AM
Thanks for sharing this info post.
Posted by: E-commerce Web Design New York | July 06, 2009 at 02:39 AM
What in the world does cannabis have to do with a fly over in new york and the cost savings of photo shop...who knows.
Posted by: Ajlouny | July 04, 2009 at 02:08 PM
All Hail Queen Nancy's 757
The Jet is a USAF Boeing 757
*And they STILL want to talk about Sarah's clothing??
Republicans! Are you out there?
*MADAME PELOSI*
Madame Pelosi wasn't happy with the small private jet that comes with the Speaker's job...no, Madame Pelosi was aggravated that this little jet had to stop to refuel, so she ordered a Big Fat 200 seat jet that could get her back to California without stopping!
Many, many legislators walked by and grinned with glee as Joe informed everyone what Nancy's Big Fat Jet costs us, the hard working American Taxpayers, for the thousands of gallons of fuel every week.
Since she only works 3 days a week, this gas guzzling jet gets fueled and she flies home to California, cost to the taxpayers of about $60,000 one way!
As Joe put it, 'Unfortunately we have to pay to bring her back on Monday Night.' Cost to us is another $60,000. Folks, that is $480,000 per month and that is an annual cost to the taxpayers of $5,760,000. No wonder she complains about the cost of this war...it might cramp her style and she is styling, on my back and yours.
I think of the military families in this country doing without and this woman, who heads up the most do-nothing Congress in the history of this country, keeps fueling that jet while doing nothing.
Madame Pelosi wants you and me to conserve our carbon footprint. She wants us to buy smaller cars and Obama wants us to get a bicycle pump and air up our tires.
These people are nuts.
If you think this is outrageous, forward it to all those on your email list!
Keep in mind the figures above do NOT include cost of plane or crew, just fuel! One wonders what her total package costs us? And she wants to tax OUR IRAs & 401Ks.....
YOU WILL NEVER SEE THIS IN ANY NEWSPAPERS IN THE COUNTRY! THEY HAVE NO GUTS - THEY WOULD RATHER SEE PEOPLE STARVING THAN REPORT ON THE MONSTER THAT IS NANCY PELOSI!
OBAMA FIX PELOSI FIRST!
Posted by: mikki1691 | June 23, 2009 at 01:13 AM
Let's also make sure to keep spending money on pharmaceutical distribution and keeping "the dangerous drug" cannabis illegal!
Why let people grow their own cancer cures for next to nothing when they can spent BILLIONS every year on "Police Enforcement", lawyers' fees, the court system and the prison-industrial complex!
As noted above...it always makes more sense to government types to spend BILLIONS when they could be spending almost nothing at all!
Posted by: ElectroPig™ Von FökkenGrüüven | May 31, 2009 at 12:58 PM